Post by kealios on Sept 24, 2011 12:45:53 GMT -5
The graphic in Bring Me My Spear shows 2 distinct deployment zones along the table edges, but the text specifies that the Defender deploys 6" from the center of the table.
Attacker VP: Gruntz units over 50% (in size?) exiting the Defender's back table edge are worth 1VP, therefore having depleted units is not worth anything.
Therefore, the Defender cannot have the same objective. Wouldnt theirs be "Enemy Gruntz units below 50% of their original starting number exiting the board are worth 1 VP to the Defender, as are units that are destroyed before exiting"?
*Also I recommend not referencing other scenarios for VP, Set up, etc. Rewriting the rules doesnt take up too much space and makes it more clear. Example: Meeting of the Minds says a vehicle is destroyed by having all 3 Criticals marked off, but this isnt repeated or even referenced in Bring Me My Spear. Rewriting this here would be clear and concise.
Attacker VP: Gruntz units over 50% (in size?) exiting the Defender's back table edge are worth 1VP, therefore having depleted units is not worth anything.
Therefore, the Defender cannot have the same objective. Wouldnt theirs be "Enemy Gruntz units below 50% of their original starting number exiting the board are worth 1 VP to the Defender, as are units that are destroyed before exiting"?
*Also I recommend not referencing other scenarios for VP, Set up, etc. Rewriting the rules doesnt take up too much space and makes it more clear. Example: Meeting of the Minds says a vehicle is destroyed by having all 3 Criticals marked off, but this isnt repeated or even referenced in Bring Me My Spear. Rewriting this here would be clear and concise.